Screener
IGPT vs PBOT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs Pictet AI & Automation ETF
Key differences
- PBOT costs 0.55% less per year.
- IGPT is significantly larger than PBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGPT follows a index tracking strategy; PBOT uses active selection.
- IGPT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGPT | PBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $875M | $5M |
| Since | 2005 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +119.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +42.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.14% | -15.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGPT and PBOT
Explore further