Screener
IGPT vs PQNT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF
Key differences
- IGPT follows a index tracking strategy; PQNT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGPT | PQNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $875M | — |
| Since | 2005 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +119.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +42.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.14% | -11.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGPT and PQNT
Explore further