Screener
IHE vs IWM
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IHE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHE | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $946M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2006 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.2% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.91% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -29.59% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHE and IWM
Explore further