Screener
IHF vs HEAL
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- IHF costs 0.12% less per year.
- IHF is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IHF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $25M |
| Since | 2006 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.56% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and HEAL
Explore further