Screener
IJH vs KAT
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 0.70% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJH follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJH | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115.7B | $688M |
| Since | 2000 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.18% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJH and KAT
Explore further