Screener
IJJ vs RFG
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJJ costs 0.17% less per year.
- IJJ is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJJ | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $329M |
| Since | 2000 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.65% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.6% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.50% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -46.11% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJJ and RFG
Explore further