Screener
IJJ vs XJH
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJH costs 0.06% less per year.
- IJJ is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJJ | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $372M |
| Since | 2000 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.65% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.6% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | 16.49% |
| Max drawdown | -46.11% | -25.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJJ and XJH
Explore further