Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IJJ vs MIDE

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF vs Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

IJJ

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$8.5B

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • IJJ is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, MIDE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IJJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IJJMIDE
Annual cost (TER)0.18%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$8.5B$4M
Since20002021
Dividend yield1.65%1.37%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+22.1%+29.0%
CAGR 3Y+14.6%+16.6%
CAGR 5Y+7.8%+8.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.650.74
Volatility 1Y15.53%16.01%
Max drawdown-46.11%-24.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IJJ and MIDE