Screener
IJR vs KAUG
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- IJR costs 0.73% less per year.
- IJR is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJR is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IJR follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJR | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102.6B | $80M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.65% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -44.36% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJR and KAUG
Explore further