Screener
KAUG vs RWJ
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWJ costs 0.40% less per year.
- RWJ is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAUG is classified as alternative, while RWJ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; RWJ uses index tracking.
- RWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 19.60% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -51.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAUG and RWJ
Explore further