Screener
ILCG vs BGRO
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.51% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ILCG is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ILCG follows a index tracking strategy; BGRO uses active selection.
- ILCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCG | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $9M |
| Since | 2004 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.38% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -35.38% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCG and BGRO
Explore further