Screener
ILCG vs FAD
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.59% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than FAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ILCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCG | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $480M |
| Since | 2004 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.0% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.38% | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -35.38% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCG and FAD
Explore further