Screener
ILOW vs XMLV
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.25% less per year.
- ILOW follows a active selection strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILOW | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $750M |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.8% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.51% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -10.37% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILOW and XMLV
Explore further