Screener
XMLV vs LOWV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.14% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than LOWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMLV follows a index tracking strategy; LOWV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LOWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | LOWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $199M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 10.56% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -13.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and LOWV
Explore further