Screener
IMF vs LQ
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Simplify Tax Aware Alternatives ETF
Key differences
- LQ costs 0.50% less per year.
- IMF is classified as alternative, while LQ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; LQ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | LQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $301M | — |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -2.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMF and LQ
Explore further