Screener
IMTG vs MBSF
Invesco Agency MBS ETF vs Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
Key differences
- IMTG costs 0.27% less per year.
- MBSF is significantly larger than IMTG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTG | MBSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $201M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.00% |
| Max drawdown | -2.86% | -0.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTG and MBSF
Explore further