Screener
MBSF vs MTBA
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF vs Simplify MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.34% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than MBSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBSF is classified as fixed income, while MTBA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MBSF follows a active selection strategy; MTBA uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBSF | MTBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $201M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.55% | 5.53% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.2% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.00% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -0.97% | -3.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBSF and MTBA
Explore further