Screener
IMTM vs IMOM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
- IMTM costs 0.08% less per year.
- IMTM is significantly larger than IMOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTM follows a index tracking strategy; IMOM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTM | IMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $153M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.13% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.8% | +49.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.05% | 19.42% |
| Max drawdown | -30.68% | -45.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTM and IMOM
Explore further