Screener
INCO vs XCEM
Columbia India Consumer ETF vs Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.59% less per year.
- XCEM is significantly larger than INCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INCO | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2011 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | +67.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.43 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.61% | 20.78% |
| Max drawdown | -47.69% | -40.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INCO and XCEM
Explore further