Screener
INDZ vs SMH
VanEck India Select ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.40% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than INDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INDZ covers emerging markets markets; SMH covers north america.
- INDZ follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INDZ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $67.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +127.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +58.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +36.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 32.03% |
| Max drawdown | -15.19% | -45.30% |
Similar to INDZ and SMH
Explore further