Screener
INEQ vs CRUX
Columbia International Equity Income ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX costs 0.13% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INEQ is classified as equity, while CRUX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INEQ covers global markets; CRUX covers north america.
- INEQ follows a index tracking strategy; CRUX uses active selection.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INEQ | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.25% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INEQ and CRUX
Explore further