Screener
INKM vs RULE
State Street Income Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- INKM costs 1.34% less per year.
- INKM is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INKM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INKM | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $14M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.88% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.1% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.98% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -28.58% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INKM and RULE
Explore further