Screener
RULE vs GAL
Adaptive Core ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.49% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $307M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and GAL
Explore further