Screener
INRO vs BILT
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- INRO costs 0.18% less per year.
- INRO follows a index tracking strategy; BILT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| INRO | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $26M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.02% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INRO and BILT
Explore further