Screener
BILT vs POWR
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; POWR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | — |
| Since | 2025 | — |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -63.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and POWR
Explore further