Screener
INRO vs PIO
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- INRO costs 0.33% less per year.
- PIO is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INRO covers north america markets; PIO covers global.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INRO | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $281M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.93% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -20.02% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INRO and PIO
Explore further