Screener
PIO vs IFRA
Invesco Global Water ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.45% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIO covers global markets; IFRA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIO | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $281M | $4.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 14.82% |
| Max drawdown | -35.76% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIO and IFRA
Explore further