Screener
INTF vs ENHI
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.11% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTF is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- INTF follows a index tracking strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $11M |
| Since | 2015 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and ENHI
Explore further