Screener
INTF vs IMFL
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
Both INTF and IMFL are equity ETFs. INTF charges 0.16% a year and IMFL 0.34%. The main difference: INTF follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- INTF follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- INTF costs 0.18% less per year.
- INTF is much larger than IMFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $1.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.60% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.2% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 16.14% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -33.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.