Screener
IMFL vs GLOF
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.14% less per year.
- IMFL is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $196M |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 12.63% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and GLOF
Explore further