Screener
INTL vs BDYN
Main International ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.44% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and BDYN
Explore further