Screener
INTL vs BEMB
Main International ETF vs Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- BEMB costs 0.69% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than BEMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while BEMB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; BEMB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | BEMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $43M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 6.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 4.25% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -6.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and BEMB
Explore further