Screener
INTL vs EMB
Main International ETF vs iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMB costs 0.45% less per year.
- EMB is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EMB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; EMB covers emerging markets.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EMB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $14.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +11.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 5.56% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -28.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EMB
Explore further