Screener
INTL vs CGHM
Main International ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
- CGHM costs 0.50% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while CGHM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; CGHM covers north america.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 3.15% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -5.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and CGHM
Explore further