Screener
INTL vs CGMU
Main International ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.57% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; CGMU covers north america.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and CGMU
Explore further