Screener
INTL vs COPA
Main International ETF vs Themes Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPA costs 0.49% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while COPA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; COPA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | COPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $13M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +116.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 38.64% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and COPA
Explore further