Screener
INTL vs EEM
Main International ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- EEM costs 0.12% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; EEM covers emerging markets.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EEM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $28.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EEM
Explore further