Screener
INTL vs EMXC
Main International ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.59% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EMXC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EMXC
Explore further