Screener
INTL vs SIL
Main International ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SIL costs 0.19% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while SIL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; SIL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -63.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and SIL
Explore further