Screener
INTL vs RING
Main International ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.45% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while RING is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; RING uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and RING
Explore further