Screener
INTM vs PGX
Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- INTM costs 0.15% less per year.
- PGX is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTM follows a active selection strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTM | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.15% |
| Max drawdown | -2.65% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTM and PGX
Explore further