Screener
INTM vs VRP
Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- INTM costs 0.15% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTM follows a active selection strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTM | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -2.65% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTM and VRP
Explore further