Screener
PVI vs VRIG
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVI follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.3% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PVI and VRIG
Explore further