Screener
INTM vs SCHO
Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTM follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTM | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $12.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.97% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -2.65% | -5.69% |
Similar to INTM and SCHO
Explore further