Screener
INTM vs SCHQ
Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCHQ is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTM follows a active selection strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
- SCHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTM | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $897M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -0.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.99% |
| Max drawdown | -2.65% | -46.13% |
Similar to INTM and SCHQ
Explore further