Screener
IOO vs CNYA
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.20% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO covers global markets; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $238M |
| Since | 2000 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.9% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.3% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.60% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and CNYA
Explore further