Screener
IOO vs EFA
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than IOO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and EFA
Explore further