Screener
IOO vs FFND
iShares Global 100 ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.60% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $99M |
| Since | 2000 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and FFND
Explore further