Screener
FFND vs URTH
One Global ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.76% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; URTH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and URTH
Explore further