Screener
IOO vs IWF
iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWF costs 0.22% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than IOO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IOO covers global markets; IWF covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.9% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.3% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.60% | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and IWF
Explore further